GHDL implementation of VHDL

This chapter describes several implementation defined aspect of VHDL in GHDL.

VHDL standards

This is very unfortunate, but there are many versions of the VHDL language, and they aren’t backward compatible.

The VHDL language was first standardized in 1987 by IEEE as IEEE 1076-1987, and is commonly referred as VHDL-87. This is certainly the most important version, since most of the VHDL tools are still based on this standard.

Various problems of this first standard have been analyzed by experts groups to give reasonable ways of interpreting the unclear portions of the standard.

VHDL was revised in 1993 by IEEE as IEEE 1076-1993. This revision is still well-known.

Unfortunately, VHDL-93 is not fully compatible with VHDL-87, i.e. some perfectly valid VHDL-87 programs are invalid VHDL-93 programs. Here are some of the reasons:

  • the syntax of file declaration has changed (this is the most visible source of incompatibility),
  • new keywords were introduced (group, impure, inertial, literal, postponed, pure, reject, rol, ror, shared, sla, sll, sra, srl, unaffected, xnor),
  • some dynamic behaviours have changed (the concatenation is one of them),
  • rules have been added.

Shared variables were replaced by protected types in the 2000 revision of the VHDL standard. This modification is also known as 1076a. Note that this standard is not fully backward compatible with VHDL-93, since the type of a shared variable must now be a protected type (there was no such restriction before).

Minors corrections were added by the 2002 revision of the VHDL standard. This revision is not fully backward compatible with VHDL-00 since, for example, the value of the ‘instance_name attribute has slightly changed.

The latest version is 2008. Many features have been added, and GHDL doesn’t implement all of them.

You can select the VHDL standard expected by GHDL with the --std=VER option, where VER is one of the left column of the table below:

Select VHDL-87 standard as defined by IEEE 1076-1987. LRM bugs corrected by later revisions are taken into account.
Select VHDL-93; VHDL-87 file declarations are not accepted.

Select VHDL-93 standard with relaxed rules:

  • VHDL-87 file declarations are accepted;
  • default binding indication rules of VHDL-02 are used. Default binding rules are often used, but they are particularly obscure before VHDL-02.
Select VHDL-2000 standard, which adds protected types.
Select VHDL-2002 standard
Select VHDL-2008 standard (partially implemented).

The 93, 93c, 00 and 02 standards are considered as compatible: you can elaborate a design mixing these standards. However, 87, 93 and 08 are not compatible.

PSL implementation

GHDL understands embedded PSL annotations in VHDL files, but not in separate files.

As PSL annotations are embedded within comments, you must analyze and elaborate your design with option -fpsl to enable PSL annotations.

A PSL assertion statement must appear within a comment that starts with the psl keyword. The keyword must be followed (on the same line) by a PSL keyword such as assert or default. To continue a PSL statement on the next line, just start a new comment.

A PSL statement is considered as a process. So it is not allowed within a process.

All PSL assertions must be clocked (GHDL doesn’t support unclocked assertion). Furthermore only one clock per assertion is allowed.

You can either use a default clock like this:

-- psl default clock is rising_edge (CLK);
-- psl assert always
--   a -> eventually! b;

or use a clocked expression (note the use of parenthesis):

-- psl assert (always a -> next[3](b)) @rising_edge (clk);

Of course only the simple subset of PSL is allowed.

Currently the built-in functions are not implemented.

Source representation

According to the VHDL standard, design units (i.e. entities, architectures, packages, package bodies and configurations) may be independently analyzed.

Several design units may be grouped into a design file.

In GHDL, a system file represents a design file. That is, a file compiled by GHDL may contain one or more design units.

It is common to have several design units in a design file.

GHDL does not impose any restriction on the name of a design file (except that the filename may not contain any control character or spaces).

GHDL do not keep a binary representation of the design units analyzed like other VHDL analyzers. The sources of the design units are re-read when needed (for example, an entity is re-read when one of its architecture is analyzed). Therefore, if you delete or modify a source file of a unit analyzed, GHDL will refuse to use it.

Library database

Each design unit analyzed is placed into a design library. By default, the name of this design library is work; however, this can be changed with the --work=NAME option of GHDL.

To keep the list of design units in a design library, GHDL creates library files. The name of these files is, where NAME is the name of the library, and VER the VHDL version (87, 93 or 08) used to analyze the design units.

You don’t have to know how to read a library file. You can display it using the -d of ghdl. The file contains the name of the design units, as well as the location and the dependencies.

The format may change with the next version of GHDL.

Top entity

There are some restrictions on the entity being at the apex of a design hierarchy:

  • The generic must have a default value, and the value of a generic is its default value;
  • The ports type must be constrained.

Using vendor libraries

Many vendors libraries have been analyzed with GHDL. There are usually no problems. Be sure to use the --work= option. However, some problems have been encountered.

GHDL follows the VHDL LRM (the manual which defines VHDL) more strictly than other VHDL tools. You could try to relax the restrictions by using the --std=93c, -fexplicit, -frelaxed-rules and --warn-no-vital-generic.

Interfacing to other languages

Interfacing with foreign languages is possible only on GNU/Linux systems.

You can define a subprogram in a foreign language (such as C or Ada) and import it in a VHDL design.

Foreign declarations

Only subprograms (functions or procedures) can be imported, using the foreign attribute. In this example, the sin function is imported:

package math is
  function sin (v : real) return real;
  attribute foreign of sin : function is "VHPIDIRECT sin";
end math;

package body math is
  function sin (v : real) return real is
    assert false severity failure;
  end sin;
end math;

A subprogram is made foreign if the foreign attribute decorates it. This attribute is declared in the 1993 revision of the std.standard package. Therefore, you cannot use this feature in VHDL 1987.

The decoration is achieved through an attribute specification. The attribute specification must be in the same declarative part as the subprogram and must be after it. This is a general rule for specifications. The value of the specification must be a locally static string.

Even when a subprogram is foreign, its body must be present. However, since it won’t be called, you can made it empty or simply but an assertion.

The value of the attribute must start with VHPIDIRECT (an upper-case keyword followed by one or more blanks). The linkage name of the subprogram follows.

Restrictions on foreign declarations

Any subprogram can be imported. GHDL puts no restrictions on foreign subprograms. However, the representation of a type or of an interface in a foreign language may be obscure. Most of non-composite types are easily imported:

integer types
They are represented on a 32 bits word. This generally corresponds to int for C or Integer for Ada.
physical types
They are represented on a 64 bits word. This generally corresponds to the long long for C or Long_Long_Integer for Ada.
floating point types
They are represented on a 64 bits floating point word. This generally corresponds to double for C or Long_Float for Ada.
enumeration types
They are represented on 8 bits or 32 bits word, if the number of literals is greater than 256. There is no corresponding C types, since arguments are not promoted.

Non-composite types are passed by value. For the in mode, this corresponds to the C or Ada mechanism. The out and inout interfaces of non-composite types are gathered in a record and this record is passed by reference as the first argument to the subprogram. As a consequence, you shouldn’t use in and inout modes in foreign subprograms, since they are not portable.

Records are represented like a C structure and are passed by reference to subprograms.

Arrays with static bounds are represented like a C array, whose length is the number of elements, and are passed by reference to subprograms.

Unconstrained array are represented by a fat pointer. Do not use unconstrained arrays in foreign subprograms.

Accesses to an unconstrained array is a fat pointer. Other accesses correspond to an address and are passed to a subprogram like other non-composite types.

Files are represented by a 32 bits word, which corresponds to an index in a table.

Linking with foreign object files

You may add additional files or options during the link using the -Wl, of GHDL, as described in Elaboration command. For example:

ghdl -e -Wl,-lm math_tb

will create the math_tb executable with the lm (mathematical) library.

Note the c library is always linked with an executable.

Starting a simulation from a foreign program

You may run your design from an external program. You just have to call the ghdl_main function which can be defined:

in C:

extern int ghdl_main (int argc, char **argv);

in Ada:

with System;
function Ghdl_Main (Argc : Integer; Argv : System.Address)
   return Integer;
pragma import (C, Ghdl_Main, "ghdl_main");

This function must be called once, and returns 0 at the end of the simulation. In case of failure, this function does not return. This has to be fixed.

Linking with Ada

As explained previously in Starting a simulation from a foreign program, you can start a simulation from an Ada program. However the build process is not trivial: you have to elaborate your Ada program and your VHDL design.

First, you have to analyze all your design files. In this example, we suppose there is only one design file, design.vhdl.

$ ghdl -a design.vhdl

Then, bind your design. In this example, we suppose the entity at the design apex is design.

$ ghdl --bind design

Finally, compile, bind your Ada program at link it with your VHDL design:

$ gnatmake my_prog -largs `ghdl --list-link design`

Using GRT from Ada


This topic is only for advanced users knowing how to use Ada and GNAT. This is provided only for reference, I have tested this once before releasing GHDL 0.19 but this is not checked at each release.

The simulator kernel of GHDL named GRT is written in Ada95 and contains a very light and slightly adapted version of VHPI. Since it is an Ada implementation it is called AVHPI. Although being tough, you may interface to AVHPI.

For using AVHPI, you need the sources of GHDL and to recompile them (at least the GRT library). This library is usually compiled with a No_Run_Time pragma, so that the user does not need to install the GNAT runtime library. However, you certainly want to use the usual runtime library and want to avoid this pragma. For this, reset the GRT_PRAGMA_FLAG variable.

$ make GRT_PRAGMA_FLAG= grt-all

Since GRT is a self-contained library, you don’t want gnatlink to fetch individual object files (furthermore this doesn’t always work due to tricks used in GRT). For this, remove all the object files and make the .ali files read-only.

$ rm *.o
$ chmod -w *.ali

You may then install the sources files and the .ali files. I have never tested this step.

You are now ready to use it.

For example, here is an example, test_grt.adb which displays the top level design name.

with System; use System;
with Grt.Avhpi; use Grt.Avhpi;
with Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Text_IO;
with Ghdl_Main;

procedure Test_Grt is
   --  VHPI handle.
   H : VhpiHandleT;
   Status : Integer;

   --  Name.
   Name : String (1 .. 64);
   Name_Len : Integer;
   --  Elaborate and run the design.
   Status := Ghdl_Main (0, Null_Address);

   --  Display the status of the simulation.
   Put_Line ("Status is " & Integer'Image (Status));

   --  Get the root instance.

   --  Disp its name using vhpi API.
   Vhpi_Get_Str (VhpiNameP, H, Name, Name_Len);
   Put_Line ("Root instance name: " & Name (1 .. Name_Len));
end Test_Grt;

First, analyze and bind your design:

$ ghdl -a counter.vhdl
$ ghdl --bind counter

Then build the whole:

$ gnatmake test_grt -aL`grt_ali_path` -aI`grt_src_path` -largs
 `ghdl --list-link counter`

Finally, run your design:

$ ./test_grt
Status is  0
Root instance name: counter